North Korea criticises 'hostile' monitoring group's report on Russia tiesNew Foto - North Korea criticises 'hostile' monitoring group's report on Russia ties

SEOUL (Reuters) -North Korea condemned a multilateral sanctions monitoring group's recent report on ties with Russia as political and biased, saying its military cooperation with Moscow was a "legitimate exercise of the sovereign right," state media said on Monday. A report by the Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team, a group comprising 11 UN members, said North Korea enabled Russia to increase missile attacks against critical Ukrainian civilian infrastructure and supplied more than 20,000 containers of munitions. The MSMT is "a political tool operating according to the geopolitical interests of the West and, therefore, it has no justification to investigate the exercise of sovereign rights of other countries," the North Korean Foreign Ministry said in a statement cited by the state KCNA news agency. The ministry called the group's move "hostile" and "outrageous encroachment" on its sovereignty. The group also said Moscow helped North Korea improve missile performance in return by supplying data. It was launched in October last year to monitor U.N. sanctions against North Korea after a Security Council panel was scrapped by Russia and China. After months of silence, North Korea and Russia confirmed in April Pyongyang had deployed troops to fight for Russia in the war in Ukraine as part of a comprehensive strategic partnership treaty their leaders signed last year. The Foreign Ministry said its Russia military cooperation was legitimate following their treaty requiring each parties to provide military assistance in case of an armed attack against the other. "We express serious concern over the provocative acts of the West to encroach upon the sovereign rights of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea with its unilateral and high-handed political and legal standards as a yardstick and give stern warning against the negative consequences to be entailed by its reckless acts," the ministry said, according to state media. (Reporting by Ju-min Park; Editing by Rod Nickel)

North Korea criticises 'hostile' monitoring group's report on Russia ties

North Korea criticises 'hostile' monitoring group's report on Russia ties SEOUL (Reuters) -North Korea condemned a multilateral ...
China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade dealNew Foto - China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal

(Reuters) -China said on Monday that U.S. President Donald Trump's accusations that Beijing had violated the consensus reached in Geneva trade talks were "groundless", and promised to take forceful measures to safeguard its interests. The comment by the commerce ministry was in response to Trump's remarks on Friday that China had breached a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs. The ministry said China had implemented and actively upheld the agreement reached last month in Geneva, while the U.S. had introduced multiple "discriminatory restrictive" measures against China. Those measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and revoking visas for Chinese students, the ministry added. "The U.S. government has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations," the ministry said in a statement. It did not elaborate on what forceful measures it might take in response. Beijing and Washington agreed in mid-May in Geneva to pause triple-digit tariffs for 90 days. In addition, China also promised to lift trade countermeasures that restricted its exports of the critical metals needed for U.S. semiconductor, electronics and defence production. Trump on Friday also announced a doubling of import tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50%. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it ships very little to the United States after a 25% tariff imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China ranks third among aluminium suppliers. (Reporting by Shuyan Wang and Chen Aizhu; Editing by Tom Hogue and Kate Mayberry)

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal (Reuters) -China said on Monday that U.S. President Donald Trump...
11 stabbed at Salem, Oregon mission that aids homeless peopleNew Foto - 11 stabbed at Salem, Oregon mission that aids homeless people

Eleven people were stabbed Sunday evening at a Salem, Oregon mission that aids homeless people and a male suspect was in custody, police said. All the victims were brought to a local hospital with "varying types of injuries," police added. It happened at the Union Gospel Mission, which helps "men, women, and children break free from homelessness through the transforming grace of Jesus Christ,"according to its website. There was no word on what prompted the attack or the suspect's identity. The wonderfully weird world of artist Luigi Serafini Fans turn out for estate sale at home of Tom Petty Dozens killed in attack near Gaza aid delivery point, witnesses blame IDF, Israel denies involvement

11 stabbed at Salem, Oregon mission that aids homeless people

11 stabbed at Salem, Oregon mission that aids homeless people Eleven people were stabbed Sunday evening at a Salem, Oregon mission that aids...
Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in UniformNew Foto - Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniform

Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniformoriginally appeared onParade. A sweet picture ofTaylor Swiftin her full Brownie regalia is making the rounds online after a local branch of the Girl Scouts of the USA posted it online. The Girl Scouts of Michigan dug up the rare childhood photo of the superstar to celebrate the news thatshe'd bought back the rights to her first six albums, posting the sweet snap alongside one of the ones the "Karma" songstress posted to mark the occasion, which showed her sitting crosslegged on the ground with vinyl copies of her reclaimed works spread around her in a semicircle. The throwback photo found a much younger Swift, likely between the ages of seven and nine, wearing a Brownie vest labeled for the Girl Scouts U.S.A. Great Valley troop, which links back to Eastern Pennsylvania—where she grew up. She posed next to another blonde little girl who proudly showed of her patches on a sash that also showed their troop number: 665. "When Girl Scouts set their minds to something, there's no limit to what they can achieve. With courage, confidence, and character, we're building a generation that knows their worth—just like Taylor Swift reclaiming her masters," the organization wrote alongside the snapshots. Many tagged their fellow Swifties in the comments of the post, eliciting many emojis and "aws" in response. "omg even the Girl Scouts are team swift," one fan said in surprise, with the Michigan branch agreeing, "100% !!" "So proud!!" someone else gushed. "Make new friends, but keep the old. One is silver and the other's gold," another quoted a song frequently sung by Girl Scouts, likening it to one of Swift's lyrics: "Just like the single thread of gold that ties me to you!" Related: Taylor Swift Fan Goes Viral for Incredibly Relatable Reaction to Spotting Singer Looking 'Flawless' While Out to Dinner in New York City Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniformfirst appeared on Parade on Jun 2, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniform

Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniform Girl Scouts Unveil Rare Childhood Photo of Music Legend in Uniformorigina...
Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hotNew Foto - Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hot

Sydney Sweeneyis a Hollywood supernova, making a dizzying amount of moves professionally, yet social media is consumed with the superficial. She's using it to her advantage. Look no further than theannouncementthat theAnyone but Youstar's brand partnership with men's bath product Dr. Squatch will now include a limited edition line of soap bars infused with her bathwater. Sweeney said the idea was born from "dirty little boys" who "wouldn't stop asking" for it after she first partnered with the company last year for asultry campaign shot in a bubble bathtub. She's not exaggerating: A comment from theoriginal Instagram adfrom October 2024 asking, "how much for the water," has nearly 40,000 likes. Dr. Squatch called Sweeney "a legend" for agreeing to create the bathwater soap, which the brand says smells like "morning wood." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Dr. Squatch (@drsquatch) Sweeney's either a genius or desperate, according to social media. While we won't make that call, we'll observe that there is such digital discourse around her — her beauty, her body and especially her love life. So who could blame the actress, who's been praised as"business-minded" and "ambitious"by herAnyone but Youcostar Glen Powell fororchestrating theirfauxmanceto market their hit rom-com, for taking it to the bank? Sweeney is a studio moneymaker. The films she acted in, as of press time, have earned $244,399,399 worldwide, according tothe Numbers. She's also a storytelling mover and shaker through her production company, Fifty-Fifty Films, which she cofounded in 2020 with her producing partner and former fiancé Jonathan Davino. The films she's produced have made $243,952,681 worldwide. Yet her love life drives much of the conversation around her. Sweeney chose not to even confirm her reportedbroken engagementfrom Davino in 2025 — and yet that consumed the Q1 gossip cycle. The fact that they still hang out and work together has only fueled the web talk. The bigger story has become who she'll date next. Social media went cray-cray when, after her Davino split, she attended Powell's sister's wedding. Had the costars coupled up?Apparently no.But the idea that thissmoldering movie scenecould be reality just wound up the masses. There was yet another fervor when Sweeney wasclose-talkingwith her costar inThe Housemaid, Brandon Sklenar, at Stagecoach in April. Just talking to her formerDownfalls Highcostar Machine Gun Kelly andWhite Lotusactor Patrick Schwarzenegger at a Las Vegas party in May led to a"flirty threesome" headline— among other suggestive gossip. She can't even stand next to a man without a flurry of innuendo. Social media isn't just obsessed with Sweeney's love life; there's plenty more trivial chatter to go around. Almost as soon as she broke through in Hollywood,discourse about her looksandbodybegan. In December, trollsposted cruel commentsafter she muscled up to playboxer Christy Martin. It's not just the random keyboard warriors having their say. Veteran film producerCarol Baum saidthat Sweeney is "not pretty" and "can't act" and calledAnyone but You"unwatchable." In response,Sweeney called Hollywood's "womenempowering other women" movement a facade. She also let her style make a statement, mock apologizingfor having "great tits." Why are people so shallow when it comes to Sweeney? Turns out, it's an age-old formula of stardom plus gender. "When the concept of Hollywood stardom first emerged in the 1910s, much of the original discourse focused on actors as picture personalities, which meant that fan culture focused on the various onscreen roles actors had played," Claire Sisco King, Vanderbilt University's associate professor and chair of Cinema and Media Arts, tells Yahoo Entertainment. "Pretty quickly, however, this discourse began to focus as much on the private lives of stars as it did on their work," as fan magazine coverage began to extend to the love lives of stars in the 1920s. Now, 100 years later, that coverage has not only persisted but also intensified due to the rise of reality TV coupled with the boom of social media, which has "created heightened audience expectations of access to and intimacy with famous people," King says. There is a more critical lens on females than males, "which is in keeping with traditional gender norms in our culture," King says. "While it has been historically acceptable for men to have professional lives and to be associated with the public sphere, U.S. culture still tends to expect that women be tied to concepts of home, family and love. Discourse about Hollywood often insists that women be attached to men in adherence with these traditional gender norms." It's common for internet culture "to fixate on the romantic lives of famous women," King says, "and the treatment of Sydney Sweeney is in keeping with these patterns. Such emphasis especially applies to women who are constructed as 'bombshells' because so much of their persona becomes attached to their perceived attractiveness and appeal as objects of desire for heterosexual men." When it comes to Sweeney being connected to her romantic leads, that's also typical because it "helps to preserve the fantasy that audiences enjoy when they watch fictional love stories that feel as if they could be real." Sweeney wisely leaned in on that fantasy withAnyone but Youwhen she and Powell pretended there could be something going on to help market the movie. That waspart of the film's success. But female actresses walk a fine line. Anytime women take roles that are outside the box we see them in, people view it "as a kind of betrayal," says King. For Sweeney, "An example of this inverse perspective [is] when many fans — especially men — expressed dislike at the change in her appearance while shooting the Martin biopic." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sydney Sweeney (@sydney_sweeney) While the social media noise blasts, Sweeney is methodically plotting her career — and building up her bank account. Just a handful of film projects she has slated are starring roles: the Martin biopic, a screen adaptation of the video gameSplit Fiction, the psychological thrillerThe Housemaidand along-awaitedBarbarellaremake. As she did withAnyone but You,she will again double-dip and produce all four. Sweeney has talked about beinghands-onwhen it comes to producing projects, saying she kept Sony's marketing team "awake at night because I couldn't stop with ideas" aroundAnyone but You.She said she was on every call and in text group chats. With the confidence of a seasoned Hollywood player, Sweeney said she accepts roles — like in 2024'sdisappointing-and-she-knew-itMadame Web— as a "building block" in getting her own projects made. "Everything in my career I do not just for that story, butstrategic business decisions," she said. "Because I did that, I was able to sellAnyone but You[and] getBarbarella." Sweeney's business sense extends to money management. She's called herself a"huge saver,"explaining, "I don't just go and spend money. I like to invest. I like real estate. I like making, hopefully, smart choices with the money I'm making." There's a personal reason behind that: Sweeney'sparents went through bankruptcywhen she was young. Despite her stardom, she worries abouthow much money she has going in and out. She's said that if she didn't take brand partnerships — like Dr. Squatch but also beauty (Laneige) and fashion brands (Miu Miu) — on the side,she couldn't pay her bills. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Sydney Sweeney (@sydney_sweeney) Sweeney's business acumen has been praised by not just her costars but also by executives and collaborators. Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group head Tom Rothman called her a"force of nature"and said the studio is lucky to be in business with her. Jessica Goodman, whose YA novelThey Wish They Were Usis being adapted into a series by Sweeney, called her"very savvy"with an ability "to get things done in a way that might surprise people." Jennifer Millar, Sweeney's talent agent for over a decade, has said,"From the beginning she knew what she wanted.She knew how she was going to get there, and she's been doing it." Sweeney is, after all, the same girl who, at 12, made aPowerPoint presentationto convince her parents to allow her to pursue acting. Her pitch worked and has paid off. It's paying off again as she turns leering comments into a money-making brand campaign for soap, which has resulted in her very own product. And people are lapping it up.

Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hot

Sydney Sweeney and the business of being hot Sydney Sweeneyis a Hollywood supernova, making a dizzying amount of moves professionally, yet s...
Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thrillerNew Foto - Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thriller

WHITE PLAINS, NY – Most former presidents write memoirs after they leave the White House. Former PresidentBill Clintonhas been there, done that. First on his literary agenda now? Writing political thrillers. Clinton is a thriller reader himself, but more than that he just really wanted a chance to work with bestselling authorJames Patterson.Their third novel, "The First Gentleman" is out now from Little, Brown and Company. Sitting down for an interview with USA TODAY, the prolific pair catch up like a couple of old friends – Clinton shares a story of tourists he spotted reading his wife's book while in Korea and gives Patterson the name of a new author to check out. "He reads everything," Patterson tells me. Both love S.A. Cosby, Michael Connelly and Lee Child. In their latest novel, the fictional Madame President Wright's husband is on trial for murder, a potential crime uncovered by journalist couple Brea and Garrett. Not only is it harmful to the White House image for the first gentleman and former Patriots player to be accused of murder, but it threatens to upend the carefully crafted economic "Grand Bargain" the president is nearly ready to announce. It's a twisty thriller with plenty of inside jobs, political sabotage and many, many deaths. Clinton and Patterson take us inside their writing process, revealing how they weave details pulled from real life with fictional characters to create the next big nail-biter. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity. Question:How has your collaboration changed over three books? Patterson: I don't think it's changed. Other than, I will say, I think this turned out really, really well. If somebody's looking to read a book with really good characters and great story or if they want to find out sort of how Washington really works, I think this is really cool for either one of those kinds of people. But initially we had, it was a little bit of a problem in terms of getting the characters real. They weren't working and we just kept going at it. Clinton: We had this just gut-wrenching conversation because in the beginning, we were excited – what would it be like to write a book that was from the point of view of the first gentleman, the first woman president's husband? It had all kinds of fascinating ramifications. But then something happened while we were doing it and I realized we hadn't created anybody you could like. Patterson: We have these two (reporters) and they weren't working, either, in the beginning. When people think of my writing, they go "short chapters," but the whole thing is character. Alex Cross is, in my opinion, a great character. Lindsay Boxer is a really good character. The characters in "First Gentleman," there are four of them, are really good characters, and that's the key. Obviously (Clinton) was key in terms of making those characters work, especially in the White House. Clinton: People (in the White House) struggle to maintain some measure of normalcy, however they define it. Even though you have to be ambitious to be elected president and disciplined to execute the job, you're still a person. We all react differently to different things that happen. So we try to capture that. Patterson: The humanity. I wish we could get back to the understanding that whatever party you're with, (we are) human beings. I'll give you one quick example: Last year, the president called the house and my wife and he said, put it on (FaceTime). And there he was with his grandkids, and he was in a tiger suit with only his face showing. Human being! Right, and in this book, allthe first gentlemanwants to do is go on a run with no one bothering him. Patterson: President Clinton used to go on runs. Clinton: I went running every morning for years. I still have the M&M's box that I was given by the head of my security detail on my 100th run when I was president. I loved it. Patterson: Once M&M's get 20 years old you don't eat them anymore. Are there any other signature Clinton White House details that made it into the book? Patterson: You have a relationship with a man and a woman, and obviously, it would've been possible at one point for President Clinton to be the first gentleman. Clinton: It's the only job I ever wanted that I didn't get. Is that why you chose to make a female president in this book? Clinton: I had thought a lot about, long after I left the White House and Hillary was running, and I thought about it. This character, he and his president wife, they're closer to the age Hillary and I were when we actually served. So I was thinking about, even though he was a pro football player and macho guy, he was really proud of his wife. He wanted her to succeed. He wasn't threatened by her being president, but he could be threatened by people making certain assumptions about him, like he was a dumb jock, which he's not. Patterson: But is he a murderer? Clinton: We keep that hanging a long time. In the book, President Wright is trying to pass legislation to address Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare. How did you come up with the "Grand Bargain"? Clinton: I knew what the drivers of the debt are and what the politics pushing against real change are, and so I tried to think of the things we could do to get it under control that would be the most bearable, both for people and politically. Patterson: It's a fascinating thing. How do you solve the problem with Social Security and Medicaid? And there is, you know, there's in the book, there is a solution. It's complicated, which is kind of cool. You don't hear anything (today), about, well, how do we solve these problems? I'd like to hear that right now. Yes, there is a problem. Clinton: Medicaid pays for about 40% of all childbirth and pays for an enormous percentage of senior citizens' health care and a lot of other stuff. It's really important. Sothis bill that's just been presentedcuts Medicaid in order to help pay for a tax cut for millionaires and billionaires. In all respect, (Patterson) and I don't need a tax cut. We'd rather have people with health care. So these are choices, and unless people understand that these choices are being made, they can't know clearly whether they're against or for whatever's being proposed. Patterson: This lays out that there is an alternative to that which makes sense and we don't have to cut things off for people who really need help. What was it like crafting fictional presidential addresses? Clinton: I imagined what I would say if confronted with the challenges she was confronted with. If you really want to change something, people like to hear about it in speeches and imagine it, but it almost always requires a mind numbing, detail-written piece of legislation – not always, but mostly. So, I tried to figure out how to sell it in the speech and describe how complicated the legislation would be without putting people to sleep. I found it difficult, but I think it's important, because one thing I learned the hard way is if you can't explain it, you can't sell it, and if you can't sell it and it's hard, you're going to get creamed. The problem we describe is something like what really exists today. Except today, it's in many ways more severe. It's just that our economy has been, for the last 20 years, or now 30 years, stronger than any other one in the world. Patterson, were there any details about the presidency or White House that Clinton added that surprised you? Patterson: A lot of little things. I might set a scene and he'd go: "It can't happen in that room. That room is so small, there's not room for three people in that room." And anytime it pops up: "The Secret Service wouldn't act like that. They would act like this." A lot of the thriller writers that we all like, they just make stuff up. When you're working with a president, you just can't make it up, because he'll go: "No, it wouldn't work that way. Here's how it could work." One of the beauties of this book, and the three that we've done, is that it's a really good story with really good characters, but it's also authentic. Did you have a favorite character to write? Patterson: Favorite character for me is Brea – she just develops, she gets stronger and stronger for a lot of reasons, and there is one big twist in there, and that really propels her as a character. Clinton: I agree with that, and one of the reasons I liked her is that she's smart and brave and good and honest, but in the beginning of the book, she thinks something that's very wrong about a big issue, and when she knows she's wrong, she turns on a dime and does the right thing. You don't see that much in Washington. Patterson: Or in general. Clinton: There are people that think that you never admit error. You accuse other people of doing what you're doing, and you roll along. The worst thing you can do is admit that she made a mistake. I like her because she's playing in the big leagues − her whole life is on the line, and she still does the right thing. Patterson: We've sold this in Hollywood and ... the production companies go, "Well, maybe we should cast (First Gentleman) Cole." I'm going like, no, you better cast Brea, because Cole, he's a good character, but Brea, she's real, and Garrett, her partner, they are really key characters. And the president herself, but Cole, eh, I don't know. Not as big a character. Who would be your dream actor to play her?(Brea, the protagonist, is Black). Patterson: There's so many. I mean, that's the beauty right now − one of the nice things that's happened in Hollywood, especially with Black actors, so many have been discovered. There are so many choices. What are you excited for readers to see in this story, especially fans of your last two thrillers? Clinton: I'm excited for them to see, first of all, that there's still room for citizen activism that can make all the difference in the world, from people who just want to do the right thing, like Brea and Garrett. Secondly, I want them to see that a president and her husband are people. No matter what's going on, she's still got to go to work every day. If she thinks (Cole) machine-gunned half a dozen people, she's still got to go to work. Nobody else can make these decisions. I want them to see how staff behaves, senior staff, and when they're honorable and when they're not, and what a difference it can make, because you can't be president unless you can trust them. You have to have some people you trust. Clare Mulroy is USA TODAY's books reporter, where she covers buzzy releases, chats with authors and dives into the culture of reading. Find heron Instagram, subscribe to our weeklyBooks newsletteror tell her what you're reading atcmulroy@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Bill Clinton and James Patterson talk new political thriller book

Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thriller

Bill Clinton and James Patterson reveal key White House details in new political thriller WHITE PLAINS, NY – Most former presidents write me...
Ukraine's drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targetsNew Foto - Ukraine's drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targets

Ukraine'slarge-scale drone attackon Russian air bases thousands of miles behind the front lines is the latest in a long line of daring missions by Ukraine's forces against its giant neighbor. The operation, more than a year and a half in the making, involved drones being smuggled into Russian territory and hidden in wooden mobile houses atop trucks, according to a source in the SBU, Ukraine's domestic intelligence agency. The strikes caused an estimated $7 billion in damages and hit 34% of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers at its main air bases, the source said. The assault also showed that Ukraine still has the ability to pressure Russia even as Moscow ramps up its own attacks andoffensive operations. Here's a look at some of the Ukrainian force's most significant hits during the war: Analysts have called Ukraine's Sunday drone attack on the bomber bases the most significant by Kyiv since the beginning of the war. More than 40 aircraft were known to have been hit in the operation, according to an SBU security source, including TU-95 and Tu-22M3 strategic bombers and one of Russia's few remaining A-50 surveillance planes. The Tu-22M3 is Russia's long-range missile strike platform that can perform stand-off attacks, launching missiles from Russian airspace well behind the front lines to stay out of range of Ukrainian anti-aircraft fire. Russia had 55 Tu-22M3 jets and 57 Tu-95s in its fleet at the beginning of the year, according to the "Military Balance 2025" from the International Institute for Strategic Studies think tank. The Tu-95 joined the Soviet Union air force in the 1950s, and Russia has modified them to launch cruise missiles like the Tu-22. Military aviation expert Peter Layton said the loss of the bombers, which could carry the heaviest and most powerful cruise missiles, mean Russia will need to rely more on drones for future attacks on Ukraine. Outside the immediate air war, the attack on the air bases will be a major distraction for Russian President Vladimir Putin, said Carl Schuster, a former director of operations at the US Pacific Command's Joint Intelligence Center, now a military analyst in Hawaii. "Putin will direct more resources to internal security after such a domestic security failure," Schuster said. "Ukraine was able to deploy dozens of containers with drones to within line of sight of major Russian strategic bases and launch massive air strikes. Can you imagine explaining that one to Putin?" One of Ukraine's first major wins was thesinking of the cruiser Moskva, the pride of Russia's Black Sea fleet, in the early months of war. The Moskva was one of theRussian Navy's most important warshipsand its sinking represented a massive blow to Moscow's military, which at the time was struggling against Ukrainian resistance 50 days intoPutin's invasion. In April, 2022, Ukraine's Operational Command South claimed the Moskva had begun to sink after it was hit by Ukrainian Neptune anti-ship missiles. Russia, meanwhile said a fire broke out on the guided-missile cruiser, causing munitions aboard to explode, inflicting serious damage to the vessel, and forcing the crew of the warship to be evacuated. Analysts said its loss struck hard at the heart of the Russian navy as well as national pride, comparable to the US Navy losing a battleship during World War II or an aircraft carrier today. What followed was a string of naval defeats for Moscow's Black Sea Fleet. In early 2024,six sea drones, powered by jet skis, felled a Russian guided missile ship, the Ivanovets. Night-time footage released by the Ukrainians showed Russians firing at the drones as they raced toward the Ivanovets, before at least two drones struck the side of the ship, disabling it and causing massive explosions. Built following Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea, the 12-mileKerch bridgewas a vital supply line for Moscow's war effort in Ukraine and apersonal projectfor Putin, embodying his objective to bind the peninsula to Russia. Russia built the bridge at a cost of around $3.7 billion In July, 2023, Ukrainian security services claimed to have blown up the bridge using an experimental sea drone. Theattackcaused damage to the road lanes of the bridge, and, according to Russian officials, killed two civilians. The head of the SBU, Vasyl Maliuk,told CNNat the time that the Kerch attack was a joint operation with the Ukrainian navy. The bridge is a critical artery for supplying Crimea with both its daily needs and supplies for the military. A number of high profile Russian military figures have been killed inside the country over the past year. Crucially, Ukraine has never claimed the killings but it is notable that many of those killed played prominent roles in Moscow's . Last month, Russian deputy mayor and prominent veteran of the war,Zaur Aleksandrovich Gurtsiev, was killed in an explosion in southern Russia. Russian authorities said they were investigating all options into the killing, "including the organization of a terrorist attack" involving Ukraine. Gurtsiev had been involved in the Russian attacks on the Ukrainian port city of Mariupol, which destroyed about90% of residential buildings,according to United Nations estimates. Gurtsiev had "introduced his developments in the technology of targeting missiles, which allowed them to increase their accuracy and effectiveness many times over," according to the "Time of Heroes" program. In April, Russian authoritieschargeda "Ukrainian special services agent" with terrorism, after he was detained in connection with acar explosionthat killed Russian General Yaroslav Moskalik, the deputy head of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. And in February Armen Sarkisyan, the founder of a pro-Russian militia group in eastern Ukraine – described by authorities in Kyiv as a "criminal mastermind" – died following a bombing in central Moscow. The bombing took place in an upmarket residential complex in the capital city, Russian state media outlet TASS reported at the time. Ukraine has never claimed the killings but it is notable that high-profile figures have been assassinated in Russian territory. For more CNN news and newsletters create an account atCNN.com

Ukraine’s drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targets

Ukraine's drone attack the latest in a series of daring David versus Goliath hits against Russian targets Ukraine'slarge-scale drone...

 

AB MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com