Social Security garnishment for defaulted student loans is pausedNew Foto - Social Security garnishment for defaulted student loans is paused

The Trump administration says it's pausing the garnishment of Social Security benefits for student loan borrowers who have defaulted. That means a temporary pause on adecision announced in Aprilto restart collections on student loans in default. On May 5, the restart policy was put into action when the Education Department began involuntary collections through the Treasury Department's offset program, which claws back overdue debts by garnishing federal payments such as tax refunds and Social Security checks. The halt comes after the Trump administration last month retreated from another type of Social Security benefit clawback, when it announced it would only take50% of a person's monthly checkto recover overpayments, down from a previously announced 100%. In that case, advocates for senior citizens had expressed concern that the policy would lead to hardship, given thatone-third of Social Security recipientsrely on their monthly benefit check for at least 75% of their income. In a statement emailed to CBS MoneyWatch, the Education Department said it hasn't offset any Social Security payments because of student debt since it resumed collections on May 5. The department "has put a pause on any future Social Security offsets," spokeswoman Ellen Keast said in the email. She added, "The Trump Administration is committed to protecting Social Security recipients who oftentimes rely on a fixed income. In the coming weeks, the Department will begin proactive outreach to recipients about affordable loan repayment options and help them back into good standing." While most people may think of student borrowers as recent grads who are juggling loan repayments with other living expenses, there are about 3.6 million people over 60 who carry student loan debt,accordingto Bankrate. About 452,000 people over 62 — the earliest age when one can collect Social Security benefits — have defaulted on their student loans, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureausaidearlier this year. January 6 defendant refuses Trump's pardon Sneak peek: Where is Jermain Charlo? Baldwin grills McMahon on unallocated funds for students, schools, approved by Congress

Social Security garnishment for defaulted student loans is paused

Social Security garnishment for defaulted student loans is paused The Trump administration says it's pausing the garnishment of Social S...
Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talksNew Foto - Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks

Russia took weeks to present Ukraine with a "memorandum" setting out its conditions for a ceasefire, as well as key guidelines for a comprehensive treaty to end the more than3-year-old war. To practically no one's surprise, it's a list of the Kremlin's longstanding, maximalist demands that Kyiv and its Western allies see as nonstarters. Ukraine had set its negotiating stance before Monday'sdirect peace talks in Istanbul, emphasizing its readiness to declare a 30-day ceasefire immediately without preconditions that was proposed by U.S. PresidentDonald Trump. Kyiv reaffirmed its refusal to abandon a bid for NATO membership and rejected acknowledgment of Russia's annexation of any of its regions. Both sides have established mutually exclusive red lines that make any quick deal unlikely. Moscow's demands, published in the Russian media, make it clear thatPresident Vladimir Putin is determinedto ensure the fulfillment of the goals in Ukraine he set when he launched the invasion on Feb. 24, 2022. Key points of the Russian and Ukrainian documents: Moscow's conditions for a 30-day truce Russia offered Ukraine a choice of two options for establishing a 30-day ceasefire. One option is that Ukraine must withdraw its forces from Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson — the four regions Moscow illegally annexed in September 2022 but never fully captured. The second option, described by Moscow as the "package" proposal, presses Ukraine to halt its mobilization efforts and freeze Western arms deliveries — conditions that were suggested earlier by Putin. On top of that, the document also demands that Ukraine begin demobilizing its military, halt any redeployment of forces and ban the presence of any third-country forces on its soil. The "package" option further proposes that Ukraine end martial law and hold elections, after which the two countries could sign a comprehensive peace treaty. Russia's terms for a comprehensive peace treaty The Russian document declares that conditions for peace must include the "international legal recognition" of Moscow's 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula and its 2022 annexation of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. It says a future peace treaty should have Ukraine declare its neutral status between Russia and the West, and abandon its bid to join NATO. The document demands that Ukraine limit the size of its armed forces, recognize Russian as an official language on par with Ukrainian, ban "glorification and propaganda of Nazism and neo-Nazism" and dissolve nationalist groups -– conditions reflecting Putin's goals from the outset of his invasion. The false allegations that neo-Nazi groups were shaping Ukraine's politics under President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who is Jewish, have been vehemently dismissed by Kyiv and its Western allies. In Russia's view, a comprehensive peace treaty should also see both countries lift all sanctions and restrictions, abandon any claims to compensation for wartime damage, resume trade and communications, and reestablish diplomatic ties. It also suggests that the peace treaty between Russian and Ukraine be endorsed by a resolution of the U.N. Security Council. Ukraine's ceasefire position also remains firm The memorandum that Ukraine submitted to Moscow before the talks and shared with its allies emphasized the need for a full and unconditional 30-day ceasefire to set stage for peace negotiations. It reaffirmed Ukraine's consistent rejection of Russian demands for neutral status as an attack on its sovereignty, declaring it is free to choose its alliances and adding that its NATO membership will depend on consensus with the alliance. It emphasized Kyiv's rejection of any restrictions on the size and other parameters of its armed forces, as well as curbs on the presence of foreign troops on its soil. Ukraine's memorandum also opposed recognizing any Russian territorial gains, while describing the current line of contact as a starting point in negotiations. The document noted the need for international security guarantees to ensure the implementation of peace agreements and prevent further aggression. The Ukrainian peace proposal also demanded the return of all deported and illegally displaced Ukrainian children and an "all-for-all" prisoner exchange. It held the door open to gradual lifting of some of the sanctions against Russia if it abides by the agreement. The opposing positions make peace seem elusive The sharply conflicting demandsleave little hopefor any quick progress in talks. By maintaining its maximalist demands, Moscow is seemingly unfazed by repeated threats of sanctions by the West or other pressure to make real concessions. Some observers see the Russian memorandum as a way by Moscow to formalize its negotiation position. "Even an unsigned document gives the Kremlin a firmer diplomatic foothold," said Moscow-based defense analyst Sergei Poletaev. Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center noted that the document reflects Putin's key goal of securing a "friendly" Ukraine without a full-fledged military or ties of any kind with its Western allies. She noted the Russian document offers Ukraine a choice between the two options because Moscow knows that a Ukrainian withdrawal from the four regions "is not viable and seeks to push Kyiv toward the second as the primary course." At the same time, Moscow's memorandum appears to indicate that "Russia is open to considering leaving parts of the annexed regions that it does not control to Ukraine." Stanovaya said Moscow's maximalist demands mean that "the fighting is set to continue, even if bilateral interactions persist."

Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks

Putin's uncompromising demands emerge after the latest round of Russia-Ukraine peace talks Russia took weeks to present Ukraine with a ...
Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day'New Foto - Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day'

Pamela Hemphill, aformer supporterofPresident Donald Trumpwho served two months in prison for storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, has formally rejected thepresident's pardon. Hemphill told USA TODAY that she filed documents to turn down the pardon earlier this year with the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of the Pardon Attorney through the office of Sen. James Risch of Idaho. "I don't want to be a part of their narrative," she told USA TODAY about why she didn't accept the pardon. "And then, of course, it's a slap in the face to the Capitol police officers and to our rule of law." On Jan. 6, 2021, Hemphill was among the thousands of Trump supporterswho stormed the Capitol buildingin Washington, D.C., to protest the 2020 presidential election results. She pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of parading, demonstrating or picketing in the Capitol building and was sentenced to two months in jail, 36 months of probation and $500 restitution. On Jan. 20, Trump pardoned more than 1,500 people charged in the Capitol attack. In an April 2 letter to Sen. Risch that Hemphill shared with USA TODAY, the Pardon Attorney's office said it noted her "non-acceptance" of the pardon. "Our Office will not issue Ms. Hemphill a certificate of pardon and will refrain from requesting any notation of pardon on her criminal history record," the letter says. A spokesperson for Sen. Risch said the senator's office regularly assists constituents with matters pertaining to federal agencies and declined to reveal additional details about Hemphill's case. The Office of the Pardon Attorney and the White House did not immediately respond to request for comment. The 72-year-old said she pursued formally turning down the pardon because she wanted to be honest. "How could I live my life knowing that I was guilty and then I took that pardon?" she said. "It's kind of like a message that it was OK that day − it was not OK that day. That was the worst day of my life." She said choosing to speak out against Trump's Jan. 6 pardons has been difficult at times, citing backlash she's received from some Trump supporters. But "it's been worth it to know that maybe there's another Pam out there that might listen to me and and get away from the MAGA call," she said. "The benefits of being honest with yourself outweigh any of the smear campaigns you might get or the backlash, because you sleep good at night," she said. "It's inner peace." Hemphill said she started to reconsider her support of Trump about six months after she was released from prison in 2022. "It's been a gradual process, it's not like I had a white light experience," she said. Since then, Hemphill has spoken out against Trump and his narrative surrounding the Capitol attack. She alsovoted for Kamala Harrisin the 2024 presidential election. According to theConstitution, a pardon can be rejected by the person it is tendered to. After Trump issued pardons for the Jan. 6 defendants, Hemphill said she initially wrote a letter to the Office of the Pardon Attorney asking to not be included in the act. Sen. Risch's office helped her file the correct paperwork, she said, and about a month later they received the formal letter acknowledging her "non-acceptance" of the pardon. Jason Riddle, a New Hampshire man who served 90 days in jail for participation in the attack, said in January that he also rejected the pardon, according toNew Hampshire Public Radio. It's unclear whether any other individuals charged in the riot have turned down Trump's pardon. Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached atmelina.khan@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Capitol rioter Pamela Hemphill rejects Trump's Jan. 6 pardon

Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day'

Pamela Hemphill, who rejected her Jan. 6 pardon, says 'it was not OK that day' Pamela Hemphill, aformer supporterofPresident Donald ...
Julianne Hough Shares Footage of Her 18-Year-Old Self To Celebrate 20 Years of 'DWTS'New Foto - Julianne Hough Shares Footage of Her 18-Year-Old Self To Celebrate 20 Years of 'DWTS'

Julianne Hough Shares Footage of Her 18-Year-Old Self To Celebrate 20 Years of 'DWTS'originally appeared onParade. Julianne Houghwas just a teenager when she started on "Dancing With The Stars." Celebrating 20 years of the ballroom dance competition show, Hough, 36, took to Instagram to share her own journey on the hit program that she started on when she was just 18. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Julianne Hough (@juleshough) "Fresh out of Utah with $2000 in my pocket after training in london [sic] my whole childhood totally unsure of what was ahead," she recalled in a caption that accompanied various video clips from the show over the years. "Who would've thought… I ended up winning my first two seasons, had a cyst burst on live TV (yep, that happened), cried with Dr. Drew, danced with a unicycle - first prop used on the show besides a chair, judged alongside my friends@carrieanninaba@brunotonioliofficialand the ultimate legend Len, and now…. 20 years later… I'm co hosting the show that quite literally raised me." "I've gotten to experience nearly every role this show has to offer, and each one has taught me something new," she added. Related: 'DWTS' Pro Julianne Hough Shares Exciting News: 'So Amazing' The video compilation started out with an intro video of the dancer where she explained she was the youngest dancer to compete on the "DWTS," and then proceeded to follow her footsteps — no pun intended — through the years from dancer to judge to host. She also shared behind the scenes footage and blooper-like clips of confessionals with her dance partners. Hough has always been in great company throughout the years, especially alongside her brother professional dancer,Derek Hough,who took to the comments to show support for his younger sister. "Winning your first 2 seasons back 🏆to back 🏆at 18 yrs old is a serious flex 💪🏼," he wrote. Derek, who joined the show at 22,also shared his own Instagram videoand reflected on his time on the show. 🎬SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox🎬 Julianne Hough Shares Footage of Her 18-Year-Old Self To Celebrate 20 Years of 'DWTS'first appeared on Parade on Jun 3, 2025 This story was originally reported byParadeon Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.

Julianne Hough Shares Footage of Her 18-Year-Old Self To Celebrate 20 Years of 'DWTS'

Julianne Hough Shares Footage of Her 18-Year-Old Self To Celebrate 20 Years of 'DWTS' Julianne Hough Shares Footage of Her 18-Year-O...
Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud'New Foto - Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud'

Salma Hayek and Linda Evangelista are celebrating a milestone in their blended family. Evangelista's son with François-Henri Pinault, who is married to Hayek, graduated from high school over the weekend, and all three were on hand for the occasion. On June 2, Evangelista shared aseries of photosfrom the event to Instagram, including one with the three co-parents alongside the graduate, Augustin Evangelista Pinault. "I'm one proud momma," the former model wrote. The next day, Hayektook to Instagramto make her own post congratulating "Augie." "We are so PROUD of you congratulations for becoming the extraordinary young man that you are and managing to still be our lovely boy," Hayek wrote. The actress added, "congratulations to Linda, Francois and all the parents who got our babies up to this point. Easier said than done." Hayek has been married to Pinault since 2009. Evangelista gave birth to her and Pinault's son together in 2006, though the father's identity was not known until she filed a child support lawsuit five years later. The lawsuit led to a highly publicized child support trial that was settled in court in 2012, according toReuters. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Salma Hayek Pinault (@salmahayek) Pinault and Hayek share a daughter, who was born in 2007. In addition to sharing congratulations, commenters on the two posts praised the celebrities for navigating a blended family. "How beautiful to see you ladies come together to raise a great young man," one person wrote on Hayek's post. On Evangelista's post, another said, "What a beautiful example of a blended family." Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached atmelina.khan@usatoday.com. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Salma Hayek celebrates stepson's graduation with Linda Evangelista

Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud'

Salma Hayek, Linda Evangelista mark family milestone: 'We are so proud' Salma Hayek and Linda Evangelista are celebrating a mileston...
Chris Pratt Says 'Hug Your Loved Ones' After Fatal Shooting of 'Parks and Recreation' Co-Star Jonathan JossNew Foto - Chris Pratt Says 'Hug Your Loved Ones' After Fatal Shooting of 'Parks and Recreation' Co-Star Jonathan Joss

Chris Pratt paid tribute to his "Parks and Recreation" co-star Jonathan Joss on social media after thenews of his death in a shooting, telling his followers to "hug your loved ones." Joss, who played Chief Ken Hotate on "Parks and Rec" and was best known for voicing "King of the Hill" character John Redcorn, was fatally shot in San Antonio, Texas on Sunday and pronounced dead at the scene. He was 59. More from Variety Nick Offerman Slams 'Dumb F--' Who Edited 'Parks and Recreation' Scene to Spread Homophobic Hate: 'Ron Was the Best Man at a Gay Wedding!' Jonathan Joss, 'King of the Hill' Actor Who Voiced John Redcorn, Dies in Shooting at 59 Chris Pratt Says He Plays a ''Sliding Doors' Version' of the Same Character When Making 'Big Commercial' Movies: 'I'm Realizing That There Are Similarities' "Damn. RIP Jonathan," Pratt posted on his Instagram Story on Monday. "Always such a kind dude. He played Ken Hotate in Parks and was also in Mag 7. Sad to see. Prayers up. Hug your loved ones." Joss was in five "Parks and Rec" episodes between 2011 and 2015, appearing across the sitcom's third, fifth and seventh seasons. Pratt broke out on the series as Andy Dwyer, a goofy but lovable musician who dated Aubrey Plaza's cynical April Ludgate. The two also shared the screen in 2016's "The Magnificent Seven," with Pratt as one of the Seven and Joss playing an exiled Comanche warrior. Nick Offerman, who led "Parks and Rec" as the department's director Ron Swanson,told Peopleon Monday that the cast of the show had been "texting all day" to process their grief over Joss' death together. "The cast has been texting together about it all day and we're just heartbroken," Offerman said. "Jonathan was such a sweet guy and we loved having him as our Chief Ken Hotate. A terrible tragedy." The investigation into Joss' death is still ongoing, but the shooter was detained at the scene and booked for murder. In a statement on Joss' Facebook page, the actor's husband, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, alleged that he and Joss were targets of homophobic harassment and that their house burned down "after over two years of threats from people in the area who repeatedly told us they would set it on fire." The San Antonio Police Department said in a statement that there is currently "no evidence to indicate Mr. Joss' murder was related to his sexual orientation." Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts? Sign up forVariety's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us onFacebook,Twitter, andInstagram.

Chris Pratt Says ‘Hug Your Loved Ones’ After Fatal Shooting of ‘Parks and Recreation’ Co-Star Jonathan Joss

Chris Pratt Says 'Hug Your Loved Ones' After Fatal Shooting of 'Parks and Recreation' Co-Star Jonathan Joss Chris Pratt paid...
Blake Lively Drops Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional DistressNew Foto - Blake Lively Drops Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress

Image Press Agency/NurPhoto/Shutterstock ; Araya Doheny/Variety via Getty Blake Lively has requested the withdrawal without prejudice of two of her claims, relating to the infliction of emotional distress, againstIt Ends with Usdirector-costar Justin Baldoni After requesting that Lively produce relevant medical information, Baldoni's legal team filed a letter to court asserting that they're entitled to a dismissal of those claims with prejudice so they won't be re-filed "We are doing what trial lawyers do: preparing our case for trial by streamlining and focusing it," Lively's lawyers said of the move Blake Livelyis abandoning some of her claims againstJustin Baldoni, new legal filings show. In the latest volley in her ongoing court battle with herIt Ends with Usdirector-costar over theirbehind-the-scenes conflict, Lively, 37, requested on Tuesday, June 2 to withdraw and dismiss her claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Kevin Fritz, a lawyer for Baldoni, 41, filed a letter addressed to Judge Lewis J. Liman in U.S. District Court Southern District of New York requesting "an order compelling Blake Lively to identify her medical and mental health care providers" by signing a HIPAA release for access to therapy notes and relevant medical information. The document adds that "instead of complying," Lively requested to withdraw claims of emotional distress without prejudice. Doing so, it alleges, means that Lively refuses "to disclose the information and documents needed to disprove that she suffered any emotional distress" and seeks to "maintain the right to re-file her [infliction of emotional distress claims] at an unknown time in this or some other court after the discovery window has closed… Ms. Lively cannot have it both ways." Lively's lawyers, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, responded in a statement shared with PEOPLE, "Once again, this is a routine part of the litigation process that is being used as a press stunt. We are doing what trial lawyers do: preparing our case for trial by streamlining and focusing it; they are doing what they do: desperately seeking another tired round of tabloid coverage." TheGossip Girlactress "continues to allege emotional distress, as part of numerous other claims in her lawsuit, such as sexual harassment and retaliation, and massive additional compensatory damages on all of her claims." Gotham/WireImage (2) The costars' conflict began last December, when Livelyfiled a sexual-harassment complaintagainst Baldoni, alleging misconduct on theColleen Hooveradaptation's set and a retaliatory smear campaign, which he has denied. TheJane the VirginalumcountersuedLively, her husbandRyan Reynoldsand their publicists in January, alleging extortion, defamation and more. Both cases inLively v. Wayfarer Studios et al.are scheduled for trial inMarch 2026. Never miss a story — sign up forPEOPLE's free daily newsletterto stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In the original filing, Lively alleged that due to Baldoni's behavior during and after the filming ofIt Ends with Us, "the emotional impact" on her "has been extreme, not only affecting her, but her family, including her husband andfour children." In a statement given toThe New York Timesin December, Lively said, "I hope that my legal action helps pull back the curtain on these sinister retaliatory tactics to harm people who speak up about misconduct and helps protect others who may be targeted." Read the original article onPeople

Blake Lively Drops Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress

Blake Lively Drops Claims Against Justin Baldoni of Infliction of Emotional Distress Image Press Agency/NurPhoto/Shutterstock ; Araya Doheny...

 

AB MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com