Gunman arrested after shooting rampage in SydneyNew Foto - Gunman arrested after shooting rampage in Sydney

A gunman has been arrested after he allegedly shot up to 50 bullets into a busy Sydney street, critically injuring at least one person. The 60-year-old suspect allegedly opened fire from the window of a flat in Croydon Park, in the west of the city, just before 7.45pm local time (9.45am BST) on Sunday evening. Residents were forced to run for cover as bullets struck passing vehicles and a nearby bus shelter. Police locked down the suburb following reports of the shooting, which continued over a two-hour period until about 9.45pm local time (11.45am BST). A tactical police unit moved in to arrest the gunman. He was initially taken to hospital before being transferred to a police station. Authorities said the suspect has no known links to organised crime, terrorism or mental health issues, and the motive remains unclear. A high-calibre rifle was seized during the arrest. Acting Supt Stephen Parry said at a press conference on Monday that officers had yet to formally interview the man, but he was "speaking freely with police". The gunman is yet to be charged. "[He] does have a couple of children and has very few recorded interactions with the police over the last 20 years," he said. It was not confirmed whether police officers had also fired their weapons during the stand-off. One man in his 50s, a backseat passenger travelling through Croydon Park with his family, was struck by a bullet. He presented himself to hospital with gunshot wounds, including one to the neck, and underwent surgery. "My understanding is that the injuries are not life-threatening and he is expected to survive, thankfully," Mr Parry said. A man and a woman in their 30s presented to a police station with injuries and were taken to hospital. Two other men were treated at the scene for similar injuries and transported to hospital. Paramedics treated a total of 16 people at the scene for minor injuries, including shock and cuts from broken glass. Six people were admitted to hospital. "It is incredible no one has died or received more serious injuries because of this," Mr Parry said. "In my 35 years in the police, there have been very few incidents of this nature, where someone fires randomly at people in the street or passing vehicles." Police confirmed the man did not hold a gun licence and detectives were investigating whether the weapon was owned legally. A taxi driver who witnessed the ordeal told Channel Nine he had been driving when he heard a "bang, bang, bang". "And then I looked next to me, and I saw a couple of holes through the window. How he missed me, I don't know, I'm just shocked," he said. Mal Lanyon, the New South Wales police commissioner, described the shooting on Monday as "serious and terrifying". Chris Minns, the premier of New South Wales, praised the bravery of police officers and emergency services. "I saw first-hand the composure, professionalism and courage of the officers who responded to this life-threatening incident," he said in a statement. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Gunman arrested after shooting rampage in Sydney

Gunman arrested after shooting rampage in Sydney A gunman has been arrested after he allegedly shot up to 50 bullets into a busy Sydney stre...
Rescuers in India search for missing after landslides kill 24 in Darjeeling regionNew Foto - Rescuers in India search for missing after landslides kill 24 in Darjeeling region

NEW DELHI (AP) — Rescuers were scouring India's northeastern tea-growing hill district of Darjeeling on Monday for missing people a day after landslides triggered by heavy downpours killed at least 24, officials said. Teams of Indian army and disaster force rescuers were searching for the missing who are feared trapped under mounds of debris, said Udayan Guha, West Bengal state development minister. Downpours and road damage hampered efforts to reach several affected villages, officials said. Television news showed rescue workers using earth movers to clear the debris. Landslides triggered by intense rains destroyed homes and infrastructure and left hundreds of tourists stranded in Darjeeling over the weekend. Rainfall also caused two iron bridges to collapse, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said in a post on X. India's weather department forecast heavy rainfall in the region until Tuesday. Cloudbursts, floods and landslides have caused significant loss of life and property in recent months across India. Flash floods swept away an entire village in the northern state of Uttarakhand in August. On Sunday,at least 44 people were killedin Nepal due to mudslides and flooding triggered by severe rainfall. Experts say human-caused climate change is intensifying South Asia's monsoons, which traditionally run from June to September and again from October to December. The rains, once predictable, now arrive in erratic bursts that dump extreme amounts of water in short periods, followed by dry spells.

Rescuers in India search for missing after landslides kill 24 in Darjeeling region

Rescuers in India search for missing after landslides kill 24 in Darjeeling region NEW DELHI (AP) — Rescuers were scouring India's north...
Police in Australia seize guns from dozens of owners who hold views rejecting government authorityNew Foto - Police in Australia seize guns from dozens of owners who hold views rejecting government authority

WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — Police inWestern Australiahave seized guns and revoked or suspended firearms permits from dozens of owners linked to what investigators describe as sovereign citizen ideologies, or views that reject government authority. Officials linked the crackdown on firearms users believed to hold such views to thefatal shooting in August of two police officersin Victoria state, in the country's east. The suspect in those killings, 56-year-oldDezi Freeman, remains at large, weeks after he is said to have killed two officers visiting his rural property to serve a search warrant. In the years before the shooting, Freeman appeared to have embraced so-called sovereign citizen views during court appearances. Members of such movements use debunked legal theories to reject government authority. Gun owners had their permits canceled over their views Freeman is suspected of killing Detective Senior Constable Neal Thompson and Senior Constable Vadim de Waart-Hottart and wounding a third officer. Following the shooting, investigators in Western Australia used bolstered gun laws enacted in 2024 to identify weapons owners in their state who they said held similar views to Freeman's. "The mission of this operation was simple and that was to validate and verify our intelligence on who may hold sovereign citizen ideologies here in Western Australia," the state's Police Commissioner Col Blanch told reporters on Sunday. Social media posts and information from other gun owners was used to identify those targeted. Officers visited 70 properties over five days in late September and early October, seizing 135 firearms and suspending or revoking 44 gun licenses, Blanch said. Investigators relied on a legal provision that allows only someone who meets the standard of a "fit and proper person" to hold a gun permit. "If you have made it very clear that you do not abide by the laws of Western Australia, set by the Parliament, then there is no way that you can be a fit and proper person," Blanch said. Raids prompted by shooting deaths of 6 Australian officers In explaining the raids, Blanch said that in the past three years, six police officers in four states have been shot dead by members of the public, which he said was "unprecedented" in Australia. In 2022, two officers wereshot and killed by Christian extremistsat a rural property in Queensland state. The three shooters in that case — conspiracy theorists who reportedly hated the police — were shot and killed by officers after a six-hour siege in the region of Wieambilla. A South Australia police officer was shot dead in 2023. Another was killed in Tasmania in June. Shooting deaths in Australia are otherwise rare. A1996 massacre in the Tasmanian townof Port Arthur, where a lone gunman killed 35 people, prompted the government to drastically tighten gun laws and made it much more difficult for Australians to acquire firearms. When Western Australia's tighter gun laws were enacted last June, the state's government boasted that they were the strongest in the country. The changes included limiting the number of guns someone can own to 10 for most people. Six weeks later, the search for the Victoria police killer goes on Meanwhile, in rural Victoria, Australia's largest ever tactical police operation continues the search for Freeman. Hundreds of officers have traversed rugged landscapes, squeezed into caves and checked mine shafts, with no confirmed sightings of the fugitive so far. The Aug. 26 killings happened when 10 armed police officers tried to execute a search warrant at Freeman's property in Porepunkah, a town of just over 1,000 people located 320 kilometers (200 miles) northeast of the city of Melbourne. The suspect, Freeman, fled alone, on foot and heavily armed, into dense surrounding forest. He is experienced in wilderness survival skills, officials said. Victoria's Police Commissioner Mike Bush did not offer a reason for the search of Freeman's property at the time, but he told reporters that attending officers included members of a unit that investigates sexual offenses and child abuse. Australian news outlets widely reported that Freeman espoused sovereign citizen beliefs, citing a 2021 video taken in Wangaratta Magistrate's Court and published online in which he can be seen attempting unsuccessfully to arrest a magistrate and police officers during a hearing. In a 2024 finding from Victoria's Supreme Court, where Freeman tried to challenge a lengthy suspension of his drivers' license, a judge wrote the man had "a history of unpleasant encounters with police officers" whom he referred to in his submissions to the court as "Nazis" and "terrorist thugs."

Police in Australia seize guns from dozens of owners who hold views rejecting government authority

Police in Australia seize guns from dozens of owners who hold views rejecting government authority WELLINGTON, New Zealand (AP) — Police inW...
Oasis guitarist Paul Arthurs steps away from reunion tour as he undergoes prostate cancer treatmentNew Foto - Oasis guitarist Paul Arthurs steps away from reunion tour as he undergoes prostate cancer treatment

Kevin Winter/Getty Paul "Bonehead" Arthurs, the longtime guitarist for and founding member ofOasis, is stepping away from the band's current reunion tour to focus on cancer treatment. "Early this year I was diagnosed with prostate cancer. The good news is I'm responding really well to treatment, which meant I could be part of this incredible tour," Arthursexplained in a postshared to social media on Friday. "Now, I am having to take a planned break for the next phase of my care, so l'll be missing the gigs in Seoul, Tokyo, Melbourne and Sydney." While Arthurs, 60, shared that he's "really sad to be missing these shows," he also reassured fans that he's "feeling good and will be back ready to go in time for South America. Have an amazing time if you're going this month and l'll see you back onstage with the band in November." pic.twitter.com/SZJsI6eOlX — Paul Arthurs. (@BoneheadsPage)October 3, 2025 Arthurs had not publicly discussed his prostate cancer diagnosis prior to Friday. The musician opened up about beingdiagnosed with tonsil cancerin 2022, however, reflecting the following year, "I was diagnosed last year [in] March with tonsil cancer, so it was tough, a tough year to say the least, but finished treatment on June 24th. Three months after that I got the all clear." Get your daily dose of entertainment news, celebrity updates, and what to watch with ourEW Dispatch newsletter. Oasis is known the world over as the supergroup containing the infamously caustic pair of brothers,Noel GallagherandLiam Gallagher. But when the band formed in 1991, it included Arthurs and three others — none of which were the Gallaghers. The brothers joined the band shortly thereafter, and by 1994 had become an international success with the release of their breakthrough debut albumDefinitely Maybe. James Veysey/Shutterstock While founding members Paul "Guigsy" McGuigan (bass) and Tommy McCarroll (drums) both left the band in '90s, Oasis soldiered on, retaining Arthurs and the Gallaghers. The band broke up in 2009, stemming from an argument between the brothers over a show that Liam canceled, an argument that grew so heated it nearly dragged the Gallaghers into a legal battle. The band stayed broken up until 2024, andannounced a reunion tourfor this year. Though the three remaining members of the lineup are notoriously mum when it comes to press, meaning the Live '25 tour the band are currently in the midst of came with very little promotional preamble, the Gallaghers did glancingly address the only force strong enough to bring them back together: Arthurs. Whileshouting out their guitaristto the crowd at a July tour date in Cardiff, Noel noted, "If it wasn't for him, none of this would have happened." Read the original article onEntertainment Weekly

Oasis guitarist Paul Arthurs steps away from reunion tour as he undergoes prostate cancer treatment

Oasis guitarist Paul Arthurs steps away from reunion tour as he undergoes prostate cancer treatment Kevin Winter/Getty Paul "Bonehead...
Voting is underway in California on new maps that could swing US House control, check Trump's powerNew Foto - Voting is underway in California on new maps that could swing US House control, check Trump's power

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The midterm elections might be a year away, but the fight for control of the U.S. House is underway inCalifornia. Voting opened statewide Monday on whether todramatically reshape California's congressional districtsto add as many as five Democrat-heldseatsin Congress — a possible offset toPresident Donald Trump's moves in Texas and elsewhere to help Republicans in the 2026 election. The outcome of the 70-word, "yes" or "no" question could determine which party wins control of the closely divided House, and whether Democrats will be able to blunt Trump's power in the second half of his term on issues fromimmigrationto reproductive rights. The proposal is "a starting point for the 2026 race," said Democratic consultant Roger Salazar. "2026 is the whole ball game," he said. The national implications of California's ballot measure are clear in both the money it has attracted and the figures getting involved. Tens of millions of dollars are flowing into the race — including a $5 million donation to opponents from the Congressional Leadership Fund, the super PAC tied to HouseSpeaker Mike Johnson. Former action-movie star and Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has spoken out toopposeit, while former President Barack Obama is in favor, calling it a "smart" approach to counter Republican maneuverings aimed at safeguarding House control. The election that concludes Nov. 4 will also color the emerging 2028 presidential contest in which Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom — the face of thecampaignfor the new, jiggered districts — is widely seen as a likely contender. So goes California, so goes the nation? "Heaven help us if we lose," Newsom wrote in a recent fundraising pitch to supporters. "This is an all-hands-on-deck moment for Democrats." An election gamble that could check Trump's power The unusual special election amounts to a Democratic gambit to bluntTrump's attempt in Texasto gain five Republican districts ahead of the midterms, a move intended to pad the GOP's tenuous grip on the House. The duel between the nation's two most populous states hasspread nationally, with Missouri redrawing Housemapsthat are crafted state by state. Otherstatescould soon follow, while the dispute also has become entangled in the courts. A major question mark has emerged inTexas, where a panel of federal judges is considering whether the state can usea redrawn congressional mapthat boosts Republicans. If the Texas map is blocked even temporarily, it's not clear how that decision would influence California — if at all — where voting is underway. Newsom has previously indicated that California could keep its current map if other states pull back efforts to remake districts for partisan advantage, but that language was not included in thefinalversion of what's officially known as Proposition 50. GOP could be left with just four House seats in California If approved in California, it's possible the new political map couldslashfive Republican-held House seats while bolstering Democratic incumbents in other battleground districts. That could boost the Democratic margin to 48 of California's 52 congressional seats, up from the 43 seats the party now holds. Liberal-tilting California has long been a quirk in House elections — the state is heavily Democratic but also is home to a string of some of the most hotly contested congressional districts in the country, a rarity at a time when truly competitive House elections have been dwindling in number across the U.S. The contours of the race have taken shape, with Newsom framing the contest as a battle to save democracy against all things Trump, while Republicans and their supporters decry the proposal as a blatant power grab intended to make the state's dominant Democrats even more powerful while discarding House maps developed by an independent commission. Democrats crafted the proposed lines behind closed doors. Republicans hold a 219-213 majority in the U.S.House, with three vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among states that rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan — the Democratic ballot proposal would shelve that group's work and postpone its operation until the next census. Creative boundary lines create districts to favor Democrats In some cases, the recast districts would slice across California, in one case uniting rural, conservative-leaning northern California with Marin County, a famously liberal coastal stronghold north of San Francisco. In others, district lines are left unchanged or have only minor adjustments. With rural and farming areas in some cases being combined in new districts with populous cities, there is "worry about us losing our voice," said John Chandler, a partner in almond-and-peach grower Chandler Farms in the state's Central Valley farm belt. "It hurts us," Chandler said during an online event organized by proposition opponents. Who will show up and vote? Democrats come to the contest with significant advantages — they outnumber registered Republicans in the state by a nearly 2-to-1 margin, and a Republican candidate hasn't won a statewide election in nearly two decades. Still, ballot questions can beunpredictable.Voters are in agrumpymood nationally and holdmixedviews of both political parties. It's difficult to determine precisely who might show up in an election with no candidate on the statewide ballot — only a question involving a constitutional amendment on the arcane subject of redistricting, or the realignment of House district boundaries. And campaigns are competing for attention in a nation of nonstop distraction, from wars abroad to the political stalemate in Washington. Supporters and opponents are running a cascade of ads in the state's big media markets. Trump is trying to "steal congressional seats and rig the 2026 election," one ad from supporters warns. Opponents are spotlighting a recent appearance bySchwarzenegger, who in one ad clenches his fist and says, "Democracy — we've got to protect it and we've got to go and fight for it." In the state's Central Valley, Kelsey Hinton is working to mobilize infrequent Latino voters hitched to hectic jobs and child care who are often overlooked by major campaigns. Her group, the Community Water Center Action Fund, dispatches canvassers to knock on doors to explain the stakes in the election. Operating separately from Newsom's campaign, and backed by funding from a left-leaning political group known as the Progressive Era Issues Committee, they hope to boost voter participation in an area where turnout can be among the sparsest in the state. What are they finding? "People don't even know there is an election," Hinton said.

Voting is underway in California on new maps that could swing US House control, check Trump's power

Voting is underway in California on new maps that could swing US House control, check Trump's power LOS ANGELES (AP) — The midterm elect...
Tesla teases Tuesday event as focus shifts to affordable EVsNew Foto - Tesla teases Tuesday event as focus shifts to affordable EVs

(Reuters) -Teslaon Sunday teased an October 7 event, as investors and analysts await a more affordable model to sustain sales momentum. In a nine-second video posted on social media platform X, the Elon Musk-led automaker showed a vehicle with its headlights illuminated in a dark setting. The company hinted at an event scheduled for Tuesday in a separate video that had "10/7" at the end. Tesla has previously delayed rolling out a lower-cost version of the Model Y in the United States. The company said in June that it had made "first builds" of the vehicle, but would start selling it in the fourth quarter and ramp up output slower than planned. The stripped-down version is designed to be roughly 20% cheaper to produce than the refreshed Model Y and could scale to about 250,000 units a year in the U.S. by 2026, sources told Reuters earlier this year. Tesla reported record quarterly deliveries for the three months ended September, driven by a surge in EV purchases ahead of the U.S. tax credit's expiration. The teaser videos followed the expiration of a $7,500 U.S. EV tax credit on September 30, a shift that could shape consumer choices and prompt Tesla to recalibrate its pricing strategy. (Reporting by Mrinmay Dey in Bengaluru; Editing by Jamie Freed)

Tesla teases Tuesday event as focus shifts to affordable EVs

Tesla teases Tuesday event as focus shifts to affordable EVs (Reuters) -Teslaon Sunday teased an October 7 event, as investors and analysts ...
US judge blocks Trump from sending any National Guard troops to Portland for nowNew Foto - US judge blocks Trump from sending any National Guard troops to Portland for now

By Dietrich Knauth and Phil Stewart (Reuters) -A federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blockedDonald Trump's administration from sending any National Guard troops to police Portland, Oregon, a setback for the president as he seeks to dispatch the military to cities over the objections of their Democratic leaders. The ruling by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut followed the Trump administration's decision to call in troops from California and Texas just one day after she temporarily blocked Trump from deploying 200 Oregon National Guard troops to Portland. Immergut, who was appointed by Trump during his first term, said there was no evidence that recent protests necessitated the presence of National Guard troops, no matter where they came from. "How could bringing in federalized National Guard from California not be in direct contravention of the (decision) I issued yesterday?" Immergut asked Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton during a hearing on Sunday night. "Is there any legal authority for what you are doing?" Hamilton replied that the California National Guard was legally federalized on June 7, in a mission that was "not limited in any way to the state of California." Sending those troops to Portland was a reasonable step toward fulfilling that earlier mission, to protect federal personnel and property throughout the U.S., Hamilton said. Oregon's attorney Scott Kennedy argued the Trump administration's quick pivot to using other states' National Guard to police Portland was an exercise in "gamesmanship" that defied the intent of Immergut's earlier ruling. "It feels like we're playing a game of rhetorical whack-a-mole here," Kennedy said at Sunday's hearing. Immergut's ruling, which will remain in effect until at least October 19, means the Trump administration will be blocked from sending National Guard troops from any state or Washington, D.C. to Portland while Oregon and California seek a longer-term ruling in court. There was no immediate comment from the White House or from the Pentagon on the judge's order. Earlier on Sunday, Trump had said he did not know which judge issued Saturday's ruling, but that he was not "served well" by those who advised him to make the appointment in his first term. "That judge ought to be ashamed of himself," Trump said of Immergut, mistaking her gender. PENTAGON CALLS CALIFORNIA, TEXAS TROOPS TO OREGON The Pentagon said earlier on Sunday it was sending 200 California National Guard troops to Oregon to "support U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal personnel performing official duties, including the enforcement of federal law, and to protect federal property." U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also called the Texas National Guard into federal service, saying 400 troops would be sent to Chicago, Portland and other locations around the country, according to a memo provided to the court. National Guard troops are state-based militia forces that answer to their governors except when called into federal service. Trump has said their deployment in Portland is necessary to respond to protests at animmigrationfacility in the city. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom said before the judge's order that the troops were already on their way to Portland. "This is a breathtaking abuse of the law and power. The Trump Administration is unapologetically attacking the rule of law itself," Newsom said in a post on X. A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from using U.S. troops in California to fight crime on September 2, but that ruling is on hold while the administration appeals. LOCAL OBJECTIONS The move to deploy troops to Oregon is the latest example of Trump's expanding use of the U.S. military in his second term, which has included deploying troops along the U.S. border and ordering them to kill suspected drug traffickers on boats off Venezuela. National Guard troops have been deployed to police Los Angeles and Washington, D.C., and Trump has said he would send troops to several other cities, regardless of objections from local government officials. Oregon challenged Trump's efforts to federalize its National Guard, saying Trump was exaggerating the threat of protests against his immigration policies to justify illegally seizing control of state units. The state argued Trump's deployment violated several federal laws and the state's sovereign right to police its own citizens. Speaking to reporters at the White House earlier on Sunday, Trump repeated his characterization of Portland as a city overrun by lawlessness. "You have agitators, insurrectionists," he said. Immergut had said in her ruling on Saturday that although the president must be given "a great level of deference" in military decisions, he cannot ignore the facts on the ground. Accepting Trump's legal arguments would mean that he could "send military troops virtually anywhere at any time" and "risk blurring the line between civil and military federal power - to the detriment of this nation," she added. Immergut said on Sunday that "nothing has changed" since she ruled Saturday that the Portland protests did not warrant a military presence, and Hamilton was "missing the point" if he thought that troops from outside the state should be allowed to get around that ruling. The Trump administration on Sunday appealed Immergut's decision on the Oregon troops, saying that judge had "impermissibly second-guessed the Commander in Chief's military judgments." (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York; Phil Stewart and Leah Douglas in Washington; additional reporting by Brad Brooks and Julia Harte; Writing by Rami Ayyub; Editing by Sergio Non, Richard Chang, Lincoln Feast and Alexia Garamfalvi)

US judge blocks Trump from sending any National Guard troops to Portland for now

US judge blocks Trump from sending any National Guard troops to Portland for now By Dietrich Knauth and Phil Stewart (Reuters) -A federal ju...

 

AB MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com