Sabrina Carpenter Earned a Literal Fortune This Summer, and Her Net Worth Shows ItNew Foto - Sabrina Carpenter Earned a Literal Fortune This Summer, and Her Net Worth Shows It

"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." IsSabrina Carpenterrich? Short n' sweet answer: yes. But just how rich is she? Thanks to (once again) havingthesong of the summer, a chart-topping new album, loads ofsponsorships, and an entire Disney career in her back pocket, Sabrina is absolutely loaded—and the time has come to dive into her bank account. Let's kick things off with... I mean, she's been collecting paychecks since she was a kid guest-starring on the likes ofLaw & Order SVU. But Sabrina landed her breakout role as Maya Hart onGirl Meets World. Soooo, how much did she make? It's unclearBUTwe do have some intel sinceTMZreported all the way back in 2014 that Sabrina's co-star Rowan Blanchard was making $10,000 an episode for the show's 21 episode first season (which totals $210,000). As for what Sabrina has coming up, there's maybeeee anAlice in Wonderlandmusical? According toForbes, Sabrina is producing the musical and sold it to Netflix over Zoom for seven figures way back in 2020. There are no updates on where this project stands but truly cannot think of a better person to tumble down the rabbit hole. Oh and SPEAKING of Netflix, let's assume Sabrina made bucketloads (which I believe is an official unit of measure) for last year'sA Nonsense Christmas with Sabrina Carpenterholiday special. Sabrina's been putting out bangers for years (Man's Best Friendis her seventh studio album!), but obviously her impact on 2025 is where the real money-making comes into play. That said, we're still living through the last dregs of summer 2025, meaning the $$$ earned by "Manchild" and "Tears" haven't been calculated by the likes ofForbesyet. But what aboutShort n' Sweet, which gave us "Taste" and "Please Please Please" and "Espresso" (not to mention a whole damn tour)? Well, the tourgrossed over $33.3 millionfrom just its first North American leg (it's not over yet!!), while theShort n' Sweetalbum reportedly generatedover $8 millionin its first week across Spotify and YouTube. Oh, and if you're wondering how much Sabrina took home for openingTaylor Swift's Eras Tour...that's under lock and key. We do know, however, that she bought herself a fancy mansion (we'll get to it in a sec) right before ending the tour, so it's likely a lot. Sabrina's heightened fame has resulted in tons of sponsorships last year alone, including (clears throat) Van Leeuwen, Blank Street, SuperGoop, Marc Jacobs, and Skims. She's also Redken's new global brand ambassador (no news on what she's being paid, but these partnerships often run in the millions). "Beauty, and especially my hair, is a big part of my identity," she toldWWDof the partnership. "I've always dreamed of partnering with a hair brand and waited to find the right partner. It's been the secret to keeping my hair looking its best and I can't wait to share what we've been working on together." On top of alllll this, Sabrina is selling merch that is honestly extremely cute! Like thisMan's Best Friendbaby tee, which I need to own. $40.00 at sabrinacarpenter.com Sabrina purchased a $4.4 million 1930s Spanish Colonial home in the Hollywood Hills in December 2023 (right in the middle of the Eras Tour). On top of that,Architectural Digestsays she owns a $1.7 million home in Northridge, which was purchased in 2018. It leaves quite an impression: $16 million to be exact—at least, according toCelebrity Net Worth! She's up $4 million from last summer, when her net worth was an estimated $12 million (not too shabby!), but it's unclear if this figure includes all the profits from her super-sized summer, so stay tuned. You Might Also Like Here's What NOT to Wear to a Wedding Meet the Laziest, Easiest Acne Routine You'll Ever Try

Sabrina Carpenter Earned a Literal Fortune This Summer, and Her Net Worth Shows It

Sabrina Carpenter Earned a Literal Fortune This Summer, and Her Net Worth Shows It "Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or r...
Burglars Break into Tracee Ellis Ross' House, Stealing More Than $100,000 of Jewelry and HandbagsNew Foto - Burglars Break into Tracee Ellis Ross' House, Stealing More Than $100,000 of Jewelry and Handbags

Mike Coppola/Getty for Travel + Leisure Burglars broke into Tracee Ellis Ross's home at approximately 12:30 a.m. local time on Tuesday, Sept. 2 The LAPD said three thieves entered through a glass door, stealing more than $100,000 worth of jewelry and handbags This is the latest in a string of celebrity burglaries in Los Angeles after Brad Pitt's home was burglarized in June Burglars broke intoTracee Ellis Ross' Los Angeles home, stealing more than $100,000 worth of jewelry and handbags. The burglary was reported at approximately 12:30 a.m. local time on Tuesday, Sept. 2, after staff members arrived at the residence and found it ransacked, local NBC affiliateKNBCreported. Police told the outlet that three individuals entered the home through a glass door. Ross, 52, was not home at the time of the intrusion. Police obtained footage from a home security camera, and the investigation remains ongoing. PEOPLE has reached out to the Los Angeles Police Department for updates. The robbery is the latest in a string of celebrity home break-ins in Los Angeles this summer. In June, thieves broke intoBrad Pitt's Los Feliz residence through a window, also while he was out of town. Want to keep up with the latest crime coverage? Sign up forPEOPLE's free True Crime newsletterfor breaking crime news, ongoing trial coverage and details of intriguing unsolved cases. The burglaryoccurred at approximately 10:30 p.m. on June 25, the LAPD told PEOPLE at the time. The suspects "broke into the residence via the front window, ransacked the location, then fled the location with miscellaneous property," police said. There were three suspects implicated, who were not publicly identified. Earlier in 2025,Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban's Los Angeles homewas burglarized on Valentine's Day. Police sources toldNBC News,ABC NewsandTMZat the time that the burglars allegedly smashed a glass door or window to break in before ransacking the home and fleeing. Read the original article onPeople

Burglars Break into Tracee Ellis Ross’ House, Stealing More Than $100,000 of Jewelry and Handbags

Burglars Break into Tracee Ellis Ross' House, Stealing More Than $100,000 of Jewelry and Handbags Mike Coppola/Getty for Travel + Leisur...
Bruce Willis' wife Emma thanks Demi Moore for 'beautiful' words of support as he lives with dementiaNew Foto - Bruce Willis' wife Emma thanks Demi Moore for 'beautiful' words of support as he lives with dementia

Theo Wargo/Getty; Michael Buckner/Penske Media via Getty Emma Heming Willis gets by with a little help from her family. The 47-year-old British-American model and author has assumed the rule of caretaker of her husband,Bruce Willis, amid his ongoingfight against frontotemporal dementia. After courting controversy last week for revealing she and Willislive separatelyto accommodate a 24-hour health team that aids the ailing actor, Heming Willis sat down for an interview onThe Oprah Podcast, where she was greeted with a familiar face. "We spoke toDemi Moorerecently on this podcast and had the chance to ask her a few questions [about] the family's experience," hostOprah Winfreytold Heming Willis, before cutting to video of Willis' first wife, who shared in a separateJuly interview, "I have so much compassion for Emma in this.... There's no way that anybody could have anticipated where this was going to go, and I really think she's done a masterful job." Nodding her head in thanks after the tape rolled, Heming Willis commented, "Beautiful." In her earlier conversation with Winfrey, the Oscar-nominated star ofThe Substancesympathized, "There is no roadmap for how to deal with this." Moore revealed that even though "our family is very connected...so much fell on Emma to really figure this whole thing out." Moore continued, "The most important place for me is showing up and being present, just being present. Because if you project where it's going, it only creates anxiety. If you replay where it was and what you've lost, it only creates anxiety and grief. So when you stay present, there is so much, and there's still so much of him there. It may not always be verbal, but it is beautiful, given the givens." Heming Willis seconded Moore's feeling: "She's right. It's about seeing there is beauty there, right? As hard as it is to lose someone that we love, we are able to tap into what is." Entertainment Weeklyhas reached out to representatives for Moore and Heming Willis for comment. Want more movie news? Sign up forEntertainment Weekly'sfree newsletterto get the latest trailers, celebrity interviews, film reviews, and more. In aninterviewwith ABC News correspondentDiane Sawyerlast week, Heming Willis characterized her decision to currently live apart from Willis with their two daughters, Mabel and Evelyn, as "one of the hardest decisions that I've had to make." Amid some backlash to the decision and scrutiny of her motives,Heming Willis defended herself, noting in a videoshared to her Instagramon Friday, "Everyone will have an opinion, but you have to remind yourself that most don't have the experience to back it up... And if that's the case, they shouldn't offer their two cents about it, and you shouldn't pay them any mind." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Emma Heming Willis (@emmahemingwillis) Moore and Willis were married from 1987 to 2000, but remain close. Heming Willis, who married Willis in 2009, frequently joins the superstar actors' three children —Rumer, Scout, andTallulah— insharing glimpsesof the entire family gathering for celebrations, or just to spend time with Bruce. "Love you so much. Love him. Love our family," Tallulah wrote in a comment on a solemnFather's Day postHeming Willis shared in June, dedicated to "all the dads living with disability or disease, showing up in the ways they can and to the children who show up for them." You can watch Heming Willis' full interview with Winfrey above. Read the original article onEntertainment Weekly

Bruce Willis' wife Emma thanks Demi Moore for 'beautiful' words of support as he lives with dementia

Bruce Willis' wife Emma thanks Demi Moore for 'beautiful' words of support as he lives with dementia Theo Wargo/Getty; Michael B...
More than 4K lightning strikes hit California, causing 'significant' wildfire riskNew Foto - More than 4K lightning strikes hit California, causing 'significant' wildfire risk

SAN DIEGO — Late-summer dry thunderstorms rolled into California from the southwest desert region early Sept. 2, bringing thousands of lightning strikes and increasing the risk of wildfires as high temperatures lingered in parts of the state. Shortly before 3 a.m. local time on Sept. 2, theNational Weather Service office in the San Francisco Bay Areareported that numerous fires appeared to have ignited "during the past hour as a result of lightning in extreme" southeast Monterey County and southwest Fresno County. The agency noted that winds in the area had been light but fuels in the area remained very dry. The weather service later reported that between midnight and 5:30 a.m. local time, nearly 4,800 total lightning strikes were recorded, including in-cloud and cloud-to-ground lightning. Lightning data shared by the weather service showed that the lightning strikes were concentrated in areas between the inland East Bay and the Central Valley. "'Dry' thunderstorms rolled through the Central Valley and portions of the East Bay this morning. Most areas saw less than 0.10" inches of rain & there were a few fire starts," the weather service said ina post on X. Shortly after the thunderstorms moved through the region, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) reported over a dozen new wildfires. The causes for the blazes remained under investigation, according to Cal Fire. The dry thunderstorms come amid a lingering heat wave in Southern California and scorching temperatures in other parts of the state. Fire risks have been heightened across the state over the summer as high temperatures, along with dry winds and low humidity, fueled conditions forgrowth on existing and new fires. Theweather service office in Los Angeleswarned that while temperatures were expected to drop over some areas on Sept. 3, the weather will remain "very warm." Heat advisories issued from areas between inland San Luis Obispo County and San Diego County expired by 6 p.m. local time Sept. 2, while advisories for areas between inland Ventura County and Orange County remain in effect until Sept. 3. US wildfire, smoke map:Track latest wildfires, red flag warnings Daniel Swain, a climate scientist with the University of California, Los Angeles,said on Xthat a "significant" and "rapidly unfolding" lightning-induced wildfire outbreak was underway in the central and southern Sierra Nevada mountains. The outbreak is mainly impacting the Sierra Nevada Foothills, according to Swain. At around 12 p.m. local time Sept. 2, Swain reported that dozens of new lightning ignitions had already occurred in the region "with new reports coming in every (five minutes)." More lightning was also forecast for later in the day. The weather service had issued severe thunderstorm warnings through the afternoon of Sept. 2 for some portions of the Central Valley and Southern California. Ared flag warningfor parts of Northern California near the Oregon border was also issued on Sept. 2 due to "abundant lightning on dry fuels," according to the weather service. "Scattered thunderstorms with abundant lightning possible," the weather service said in its advisory. "Storms may produce little or no rain, and lightning strikes outside of precipitation cores are possible, and may cause many new fire starts." ABC10 Sacramento reportedon Sept. 2 that firefighters with the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District responded to five wildfires after more than 60 lightning strikes hit east of Sloughhouse, a community in southeast Sacramento County. Captain Mark Nunez, spokesperson for Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District, told the television station that the lightning strikes had contributed to the ignition of the blazes. Hurricane Kiko forms in the Pacific:See path tracker, forecast. Dry lightning occurs during"dry thunderstorms,"which produce little to no rainfall. On Sept. 2, across California, the rain evaporated in dry air before reaching the ground, according to the weather service,adding: "most areas saw less than 0.10" inches of rain & there were a few fire starts." Wildfires are a real concern with dry lightning. According to the weather service, the drier the storm and the drier the vegetation, the more likely lightning strikes are to spark wildfires. That's because cloud-to-ground lightning can easily ignite parched fuel without rain to help dampen it. Lightning-caused wildfiresare much larger and consume more land than human-caused fires — 53% of the average acreage burned from 2018 to 2022, theUSA TODAY Network reported. But the majority of wildfires are caused by humans, with 89% of the average number of wildfires from 2018 to 2022. During the summer of 2020, a lightning storm ignited numerous wildfires across California.USA TODAY previously reportedon Aug. 24, 2020, that more than 13,000 lightning strikes — which sparked hundreds of blazes — had been recorded since Aug. 15, 2020. Contributing: Doyle Rice, USA TODAY; Brandi D. Addison, USA TODAY Network This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Thousands of lightning strikes hit California increasing wildfire risk

More than 4K lightning strikes hit California, causing 'significant' wildfire risk

More than 4K lightning strikes hit California, causing 'significant' wildfire risk SAN DIEGO — Late-summer dry thunderstorms rolled ...
Trump cannot use Alien Enemies Act to deport members of Venezuelan gang, appeals court rulesNew Foto - Trump cannot use Alien Enemies Act to deport members of Venezuelan gang, appeals court rules

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court panel ruled Tuesday that PresidentDonald Trumpcannot use an 18th-century wartime law to speed the deportations of people his administration accuses of membership in a Venezuelan gang, blocking a signature administration push that is destined for a final showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court. A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the most conservative federal appeals courts in the country, agreed withimmigrant rightslawyers andlower court judgeswho argued theAlien Enemies Actof 1798 was not intended to be used against gangs like Tren de Aragua, the Venezuelan group Trump targeted in his March invocation. Lee Gelernt, who argued the case for the ACLU, said Tuesday: "The Trump administration's use of a wartime statute during peacetime to regulate immigration was rightly shut down by the court. This is a critically important decision reining in the administration's view that it can simply declare an emergency without any oversight by the courts." The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The administration deported people designated as Tren de Aragua members to a notorious prison in El Salvador where, it argued, U.S. courts could not order them freed. In adeal announced in July, more than 250 of the deported migrants returned to Venezuela. The Alien Enemies Act was only used three times before in U.S. history, all during declared wars — in the War of 1812 and the two World Wars. The Trump administration unsuccessfully argued that courts cannot second-guess the president's determination that Tren de Aragua was connected to Venezuela's government and represented a danger to the United States, meriting use of the act. In a 2-1 ruling, the judges said they granted the preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiffs because they "found no invasion or predatory incursion" in this case. The decision bars deportations from Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi. In the majority were U.S. Circuit Judges Leslie Southwick, a George W. Bush appointee, and Irma Carrillo Ramirez, a Joe Biden appointee. Andrew Oldham, a Trump appointee, dissented. The majority opinion said Trump's allegations about Tren de Aragua do not meet the historical levels of national conflict that Congress intended for the act. "A country's encouraging its residents and citizens to enter this country illegally is not the modern-day equivalent of sending an armed, organized force to occupy, to disrupt, or to otherwise harm the United States," the judges wrote. In a lengthy dissent, Oldham complained his two colleagues were second-guessing Trump's conduct of foreign affairs and national security, realms where courts usually give the president great deference. "The majority's approach to this case is not only unprecedented—it is contrary to more than 200 years of precedent," Oldham wrote. The panel did grant the Trump administration one legal victory, finding the procedures it uses to advise detainees under the Alien Enemies Act of their legal rights is appropriate. The ruling can be appealed to the full 5th Circuit or directly to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is likely to make the ultimate decision on the issue. Indeed, the ruling and dissent both seemed to acknowledge the judges were weighing in on issues destined to be settled only by the nation's highest court, repeatedly noting the unprecedented nature of the case and delving into 18th century conflicts and other landmark events in the nation's early decades as justification. The Supreme Court has already gotten involved twice before in the tangled history of the Trump administration's use of the AEA. In the initial weeks after the March declaration, the court ruled that the administrationcould deport people under the act, but unanimously found that those targeted needed to be given a reasonable chance to argue their case before judges in the areas where they were held. Then, as the administration moved to rapidly deport more Venezuelans from Texas, the high court stepped in again withan unusual, post-midnight rulingthat they couldn't do so until the 5th Circuit decided whether the administration was providing adequate notice to the immigrants and could weigh in on the broader legal issues of the case. The high court has yet to address whether a gang can be cited as an alien enemy under the AEA.

Trump cannot use Alien Enemies Act to deport members of Venezuelan gang, appeals court rules

Trump cannot use Alien Enemies Act to deport members of Venezuelan gang, appeals court rules WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court panel...
Kremlin says Merz views on Ukraine talks don't matter after Putin 'war criminal' commentsNew Foto - Kremlin says Merz views on Ukraine talks don't matter after Putin 'war criminal' comments

MOSCOW (Reuters) -The Kremlin said on Wednesday that German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's views on Ukraine peace talks should be disregarded after he made what Moscow called a series of "unfavourable" remarks about Russian President Vladimir Putin. Merz said in an interview with broadcaster ProSieben.Sat1 aired on Tuesday that Putin was "perhaps the most serious war criminal of our time" and that there was no place for leniency for such individuals. The Kremlin denies its forces have committed any war crimes in Ukraine. It has rejected as "outrageous" a 2023 arrest warrant issued for Putin by the International Criminal Court which accused the Russian leader of the war crime of abducting hundreds of children from Ukraine. Asked during a trip to China about a proposal from Merz that Geneva should be the venue for Ukraine-Russia peace talks, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: "Merz has made a lot of unfavourable statements in recent hours, so it's hardly possible to take his opinion into account at the moment." Asked which statements he meant, Peskov said: "About our president". Merz said in his interview on German TV: "He (Putin) is a war criminal. He is perhaps the most serious war criminal of our time that we currently see on a large scale. And we must simply be clear about how one deals with war criminals. There, appeasement is out of place." (Reporting by Reuters Moscow buro and Kirsti Knolle in Berlin; Writing by Andrew Osborn; Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

Kremlin says Merz views on Ukraine talks don't matter after Putin 'war criminal' comments

Kremlin says Merz views on Ukraine talks don't matter after Putin 'war criminal' comments MOSCOW (Reuters) -The Kremlin said on ...
The teen social media crisis is here. What now?New Foto - The teen social media crisis is here. What now?

Whether reconnecting with old friends, sharing life's milestones with loved ones or networking among work colleagues,social mediahas become indispensable for many adults and can be both a convenient and powerful way to maintain relationships and grow professionally. Teenagers, however, log on more frequently, engage more intensively and increasingly define their social identity throughonline interactions. That level of immersion comes with heightened risks alongside any benefits. Here's what percentage of teens actually usesocial media, how often they're doing so and why the platforms can be uniquely harmful to them. Research showsthat 95% of youth ages 13 to 17 report using social media. "It's near ubiquitous," notes Dr. Jason Nagata, a pediatrician at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital in San Francisco and co-author of numerous social media studies. Even children younger than the official minimum age of 13 are active users. In fact, nearly 40% of kids between the ages of 8 and 12 ignore platform age restrictions to use the networking services, perJohns Hopkins Medicine. Teens are primarily drawn to platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat and Facebook "to connect with others, share personal or negative experiences, and form new online friendships," says Elizabeth Hoge, a psychiatrist and director of the Anxiety Disorders Research Program at Georgetown University. Nagata adds that some kids also use social media for entertainment and educational purposes, and that minority groups like LGBTQ+ youth use social media "to find and receive support from people not available in their local communities." Regardless of their reasons for doing so, engagement levels are strikingly high among teens and many of them can't pull themselves away. Nagata pointsto researchhe's co-authored showing that 25% of them report spending significant time thinking about social media even when they're not online, 25% of teens say they use it to forget their problems and 17% admit they've tried to cut back but can't. Did you see?Social media is giving men 'bigorexia,' or muscle dysmorphia. We need to talk about it. Such heavy use exposes teens to a cascade of risks, with mental health impacts topping the list. A2025 longitudinal study, for instance, found that increased social media use among preteens predicted risingdepressive symptoms.Other researchties heavy use to increased anxiety, low self-esteem, self-harm behaviors,disordered eatingand even suicidality. "Our researchalso found that adolescents with greater social media use are at higher risk of developing mental health disorders like ADHD," says Nagata. Much of the harms associated with social media stems from social comparison. "Negative self-image among teens often comes from unhealthy comparisons to people online who might be heavily edited or filtered," says Joanne Broder, a New Jersey–based psychologist and fellow of the American Psychological Association. She adds that problems also arise "from spending more time socializing on social media than with people in real life" and from not having as much time to participate in healthy and meaningful physical activities. Excessive use also carries physical consequences. "Many teens experienceless sleep, sleep disruptions and poorer sleep quality," says Hoge, problemsreported byabout 45% of teens. Poor sleep, in turn, can cascade into weight gain,higher blood pressureand lower productivity. Exposure to harmful content is another risk asstudies showthat teens are more likely than adults to stumble upon self-harm imagery or extremist propaganda. Broder adds that they are also more inclined to join risky or even life-threatening online dares or "challenges" because they are less likely to identify harms or may struggle distinguishing fantasy from reality. Concerns are serious enough that in 2024 the U.S. Surgeon Generalrecommended tobacco-style warning labelsfor social media use. In case you missed:How does social media affect mental health? It's complicated. Parents can play a pivotal role in shaping healthy habits. For instance, a2024 studyfound that when parents model high screen use themselves, such as during meals, in bedrooms or in shared moments, it correlates with greater teen screen obsession. Hoge recommends creating a family social media plan to help teens monitor their own usage and reflect on what feels like "too much." Open dialogue, she adds, helps teens feel supported rather than simply restricted. Beyond the home, "schools are encouraged to adopt prevention programs such as avoiding cell phones in school," says Hoge. Experts also recommend keeping devices out of bedrooms at night, establishing screen-free meals and even considering delaying access until mid-adolescence.A growing body of researchsupports waiting until age 16, when teens are better equipped to handle peer comparison and algorithm-driven feeds. In the end, "social media is not inherently bad or good," says Nagata. He points to associated opportunities such as connection, communication and education as clear upsides. "But time spent on social media can also displace time for other healthful activities, and certain exposures can worsen mental health, so balance and caution are key." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:Why is social media bad for teens? Experts discuss.

The teen social media crisis is here. What now?

The teen social media crisis is here. What now? Whether reconnecting with old friends, sharing life's milestones with loved ones or netw...

 

AB MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com